[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EF27C76.3020805@solonet.org.ua>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:40:22 +0200
From: Denis Kuzmenko <linux@...onet.org.ua>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
'Russell King' <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
'Ben Dooks' <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 resend] Fix compilation error when CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX_DEBUGFS
selected.
On 12/22/2011 12:04 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Denis Kuzmenko wrote:
>>
>> On 12/21/2011 09:04 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>> Denis Kuzmenko wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Fix compilation error when CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX_DEBUGFS selected.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Denis Kuzmenko <linux@...onet.org.ua>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Patch is against 3.2-rc4.
>>>> CONFIG_S3C2410_IOTIMING is not selected for MACH_MINI2440. Because of
>> this
>>>> the
>>>> file s3c2410-iotiming.c is not ever compiled and enabling
>>>> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX_DEBUGFS option caused undefined reference to
>>>> function
>>>> s3c2410_iotiming_debugfs defined in that file. s3c2410_iotiming_debugfs
>>>> defined
>>>> as NULL for this case.
>>>>
>>> Hi Denis,
>>>
>>> Well, there is no error when CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX_DEBUGFS selected in
>> my
>>> case and s3c2410-iotiming.c is built...when is it happened? I just
>> selected
>>> every regarding configuration in kernel menuconfig...
>>
>> Please, try attached config (it's still failing in v3.2-rc6).
>>
> Hi Denis,
>
> Yes, when s3c2410 stuff is not selected, it happened.
> Look at me soon and thanks.
Hi, Kukjin,
Sorry, can you please explain as I can't understand. Especially second
sentence.
--
Best regards, Denis Kuzmenko.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists