linux-kernel - Re: [rt2x00-users] Poor performance and lockup with rt2800usb and Asus USB-N13 adapter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:51:12 +0100
From:	Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@...il.com>
To:	Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@...19freenet.de>
CC:	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
	users@...x00.serialmonkey.com,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] Poor performance and lockup with rt2800usb and
 Asus USB-N13 adapter

Hi Andreas,

On 12/22/11 18:31, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>
> BTW: The patch in [1] breaks the driver completely (tested with
> compat-wireless 3.1rc1).
>
> [1]
> http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/pipermail/users_rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/2011-December/004345.html
>

I haven't reviewed these patches yet, but did you apply both patches 
that were sent out earlier today (which replace the one you mention here)?

Also, can you elaborate (preferably as a response to the actual patches) 
what exactly breaks with these patches? We need that kind of feedback to 
determine if we should apply these patches, as we (the maintainers) 
cannot always test and extensively review the patches in a short time.

---
Gertjan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/