[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1324523412.22361.471.camel@sli10-conroe>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:10:12 +0800
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: JBottomley@...allels.com, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
"Wu, Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
Subject: [patch 1/2]scsi: scsi_run_queue() doesn't use local list to handle
starved sdev
scsi_run_queue() picks off all sdev from host starved_list to a local list,
then handle them. If there are multiple threads running scsi_run_queue(),
the starved_list will get messed. This is quite common, because request
rq_affinity is on by default.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2011-12-21 16:56:23.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2011-12-22 09:33:09.000000000 +0800
@@ -401,9 +401,8 @@ static inline int scsi_host_is_busy(stru
*/
static void scsi_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
{
- struct scsi_device *sdev = q->queuedata;
+ struct scsi_device *sdev = q->queuedata, *head_sdev = NULL;
struct Scsi_Host *shost;
- LIST_HEAD(starved_list);
unsigned long flags;
/* if the device is dead, sdev will be NULL, so no queue to run */
@@ -415,9 +414,8 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct reques
scsi_single_lun_run(sdev);
spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
- list_splice_init(&shost->starved_list, &starved_list);
- while (!list_empty(&starved_list)) {
+ while (!list_empty(&shost->starved_list)) {
/*
* As long as shost is accepting commands and we have
* starved queues, call blk_run_queue. scsi_request_fn
@@ -431,8 +429,13 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct reques
if (scsi_host_is_busy(shost))
break;
- sdev = list_entry(starved_list.next,
+ sdev = list_entry(shost->starved_list.next,
struct scsi_device, starved_entry);
+ if (sdev == head_sdev)
+ break;
+ if (!head_sdev)
+ head_sdev = sdev;
+
list_del_init(&sdev->starved_entry);
if (scsi_target_is_busy(scsi_target(sdev))) {
list_move_tail(&sdev->starved_entry,
@@ -445,9 +448,13 @@ static void scsi_run_queue(struct reques
__blk_run_queue(sdev->request_queue);
spin_unlock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
spin_lock(shost->host_lock);
+ /*
+ * the head sdev is no longer starved and removed from the
+ * starved list, select a new sdev as head.
+ */
+ if (head_sdev == sdev && list_empty(&sdev->starved_entry))
+ head_sdev = NULL;
}
- /* put any unprocessed entries back */
- list_splice(&starved_list, &shost->starved_list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
blk_run_queue(q);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists