[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111223104918.GD2834@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:49:18 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@...com>
Cc: sameo@...ux.intel.com, lrg@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, nsekhar@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MFD: TPS65217: Add new mfd device for TPS65217
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:51:19AM +0530, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> The TPS65217 chip is a power management IC for Portable Navigation Systems
> and Tablet Computing devices. It contains the following components:
I can't help but thinking that there ought to be more code sharing
between the various TI PMIC drivers.
> +static int tps65217_i2c_read_device(struct tps65217_dev *tps65217, char reg,
> + int bytes, void *dest)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *i2c = tps65217->i2c_client;
> + struct i2c_msg xfer[2];
> + int ret;
Use regmap for the register I/O, this will save a lot of code and will
also give access to things like the register cache code.
> + tps65217 = kzalloc(sizeof(struct tps65217_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (tps65217 == NULL)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Use devm_kzalloc(), it saves all the unwinding code.
> +/* All register addresses */
> +#define TPS65217_REG_CHIPID 0X00
You should verify this as part of the probe() routine - read it back to
make sure it's what's expected, and log the chip revision too in case it
is useful for diagnostics.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists