[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1324638633-25230-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:10:33 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] udf: Mark LVID buffer as uptodate before marking it dirty
When we hit EIO while writing LVID, the buffer uptodate bit is cleared.
This then results in an anoying warning from mark_buffer_dirty() when we
write the buffer again. So just set uptodate flag unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
fs/udf/super.c | 6 ++++++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
I carry this patch in my tree and will merge it with Linus in the next
merge window if noone objects.
diff --git a/fs/udf/super.c b/fs/udf/super.c
index e185253..87cb24a 100644
--- a/fs/udf/super.c
+++ b/fs/udf/super.c
@@ -1799,6 +1799,12 @@ static void udf_close_lvid(struct super_block *sb)
le16_to_cpu(lvid->descTag.descCRCLength)));
lvid->descTag.tagChecksum = udf_tag_checksum(&lvid->descTag);
+ /*
+ * We set buffer uptodate unconditionally here to avoid spurious
+ * warnings from mark_buffer_dirty() when previous EIO has marked
+ * the buffer as !uptodate
+ */
+ set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
sbi->s_lvid_dirty = 0;
mutex_unlock(&sbi->s_alloc_mutex);
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists