[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOh0hwNrOHVOx6eFf6EM8MmGwjeCP4-PfCHtMPnBQm4th91Q8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:29:10 +0530
From: Gaurav Saxena <grvsaxena419@...il.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Intercepting system calls
I found that Ubuntu does not have a kprobe enabled kernel. :( I don't
think I could use kprobes then.
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Gaurav Saxena <grvsaxena419@...il.com> wrote:
> Hello Jiri
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Gaurav Saxena wrote:
>>
>>> I am writing an application for which I need to intercept some
>>> filesystem system calls eg. unlink. I need unlink to call my code
>>> before deleting abc so that I could probably prevent unlink . I would
>>> like to implement this in a kernel module instead of modifying kernel
>>> code itself. I would like to intercept system calls by replacing
>>> system calls but I have not been able to find any method of doing that
>>> in linux > 3.0. Please suggest some method of doing that.
>>
>> Write a kernel module that instruments sys_unlink() via krpobes. See
>> Documentation/kprobes.txt for details.
> Ok. I am looking at its details, will try that. But how could a probe
> prevent execution of a system call?
>>
>> --
>> Jiri Kosina
>> SUSE Labs
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards ,
> Gaurav
--
Thanks and Regards ,
Gaurav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists