[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EF471ED.1030902@metafoo.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:19:57 +0100
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
CC: Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <npalix.work@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cocci@...u.dk, mmarek@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH 2/2] coccinelle: Add patch for replacing open-coded
IS_ERR_OR_NULL
On 12/21/2011 01:10 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>
>> On 12/20/2011 11:24 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>> For this one, I made quite a number of changes, some of which required
>>> fixing a bug in Coccinelle... I will try to release the bug fix
>>> shortly. In general, though, I have added ... between the two tests. I
>>> also got rid of the focus on ifs in the org and report rules.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, thanks. Was the removing of the ifs in related to the Coccinelle
>> bug? I
>> always get an error if I start a match with a conditional.
>
> Not at all. The bug was that a patterm like:
>
> @depends on patch@
> expression x;
> @@
> - IS_ERR(x)
> + IS_ERR_OR_NULL(x)
> || ...
> - || x == NULL
>
> thought that it should be applied in two ways, giving an error about a
> double transformation of the IS_ERR call.
>
> Could you reproduce the example that caused problems?
Hm, I can reproduce it anymore, even with my original patch, must have been
caused by some other error I had in the semantic patch at that time.
- Lars
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists