linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: use usleep_range() instead of mdelay()/udelay()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:31:29 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Dmitry Antipov <dmitry.antipov@...aro.org>
Cc:	linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: use usleep_range() instead of
 mdelay()/udelay()

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:04:53AM +0400, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> From 00753f3d48c4b6c45c1778c3e37bc9949ed79e77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Dmitry Antipov <dmitry.antipov@...aro.org>
> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:01:42 +0400
> Subject: [PATCH] regulator: use usleep_range() instead of mdelay()/udelay()

Follow the instructions in Documentation/SubmittingPatches.

> -			if (delay >= 1000) {
> -				mdelay(delay / 1000);
> -				udelay(delay % 1000);
> -			} else if (delay) {
> -				udelay(delay);
> -			}
> +			usleep_range(delay, delay + 1000);

These two aren't obviously equivalent in several respects and you
haven't provided any explanation for what you're trying to accomplish.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/