[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25CAFE86FAAED24C90F0AC30DBE9995381BD@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 01:57:29 +0000
From: "Zhang, MingmingX" <mingmingx.zhang@...el.com>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: [patch] intel_idle: Delete meaningless local_irq_disable() call in
intel_idle.c.
From: mzha38X <mingmingx.zhang@...el.com>
intel_idle.c is a bit misleading in a sense that local_irq_disable,it
actually does nothing. Real irq disable happens earlier in process_32.c:cpu_idle.
Basically, cpuidle_state->enter is called, cpu irq is disabled.
cpuidle_state->enter would turn on irq when exiting.
intel_idle doesn't follow this assumption. Although it doesn't
cause real issue, it misleads developers. Below patch deletes
the calling to local_irq_disable() at entry.
Signed-off-by: mzha38X <mingmingx.zhang@...el.com>
---
drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
index 5d2f8e1..28f0394 100644
--- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
@@ -247,8 +247,6 @@ static int intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
cstate = (((eax) >> MWAIT_SUBSTATE_SIZE) & MWAIT_CSTATE_MASK) + 1;
- local_irq_disable();
-
/*
* leave_mm() to avoid costly and often unnecessary wakeups
* for flushing the user TLB's associated with the active mm.
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists