linux-kernel - Re: possible ERESTARTNOHAND leak into userspace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111223161637.GD26157@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
Date:	Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:16:37 +0100
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Anders Johansson <ajohansson@...ell.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: possible ERESTARTNOHAND leak into userspace

On Fri 23-12-11 16:02:27, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 12/23, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > this has already been discussed few years back with reports that select
> > returned with ERESTARTNOHAND in multi-threaded applications
> > (http://forum.soft32.com/linux/PATCH-select-fix-sys_select-leak-ERESTARTNOHAND-userspace-ftopict338572.html)
> >
> > Dave has come up with a possible explanation of the race but there was
> > no further follow up with a conclusion.
> >
> > Just for reference:
> >         Thread_A				Thread_B
> > 	CPU0					CPU1
> > 						syscall_XYZ
> > core_sys_select
> >   ret = -ERESTARTNOHAND;
> >   if (signal_pending(current))
> >      					do_notify_resume
> >      					  do_signal (clear signal pending)
> 
> "clear signal pending" can't affect Thread_A. Even if it steals
> the signal sent to Thread_A.

Ah, I have totally missed that signal_pending is thread local.

[...]
> > The race window is rather small and hard to trigger but we have seen
> > reports where people really saw select returning ERESTARTNOHAND (on
> > 2.6.16 based kernel - x86_64).
> > I am not able to reproduce that myself neither with .16 kernel nor with
> > the current vanilla so I am not sure whether the problem has been fixed
> > already. But I do not see what prevents the race with vanilla.
> 
> I hope the problem was already fixed, at least I do not see anything
> wrong in core_sys_select().

And core_sys_select is basically same in 2.6.16 som I am still wondering
how we could leak the value.

Anyway this seems to be a .16 specific issue, sorry about the noise.

> 
> Oleg.
> 

Thanks a lot for the response.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9    
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/