[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EF3FE64.4070102@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:07:00 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] KVM: MMU: remove PT64_SECOND_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT
On 12/18/2011 06:42 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/16/2011 12:18 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> It is not used, remove it
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 1 -
>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> index 5d0f0e3..234a32e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> @@ -91,7 +91,6 @@ module_param(dbg, bool, 0644);
>> #define PTE_PREFETCH_NUM 8
>>
>> #define PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT 9
>> -#define PT64_SECOND_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT 52
>>
>>
>
> Don't see a reason to drop it, we may use it some day.
>
Anyway, it is not used in currently code, I do not have strong opinion on it :)
Please ignore it if you do not like.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists