[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EF62C45.2080501@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 23:47:17 +0400
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To: Phil Miller <mille121@...inois.edu>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION,STABLE,BISECTED] Hang on resume from standby in 3.1.[56],
3.2-rc*
On 24.12.2011 20:51, Phil Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 03:09, Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru> wrote:
>> On 24.12.2011 10:40, Phil Miller wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:31, Phil Miller <mille121@...inois.edu> wrote:
>>>> I've got a Dell Precision T1500 (lspci, dmidecode, and dmesg output at
>>>> http://charm.cs.uiuc.edu/~phil/linux-suspend-hang/ ) that I generally
>>>> suspend when I'm out of the house or asleep, and wake up when I want
>>>> to use it. Sadly, a recent change to the kernel has disrupted that
>>>> happy state of affairs. When I run the most recent stable or
[]
>> I noticed that my host also stopped resuming with 3.1, and noted that
>> with 3.1.3 it works ok. I'm now trying to revert this commit too, to
>> see if that's the problem.
Actually that wasn't the issue. After several iterations (which took
some time) I found out that I can't reproduce the hangs which I were
able to trigger trivially just yesterday. I can only guess these hangs
were due to some other software components (gnome, X stuff, whatever)
which happened to be upgraded today too, together with the kernel, and
the problem went away. I booted into kernel with which the system
definitely had the issue at hand (3.1.3), but it resumes from suspend
(both s2ram and s2disk) without any issue whatsoever, I did several
resumes of each kind in a row, intermixed them together.
> I first noticed this using Debian unstable's packaged kernels, which
> call themselves 3.x.0, but actually get revved through the stable
> versions 3.x.y (I'll probably complain about that misnaming to them).
> The upgrade from 3.1.4 to 3.1.5 is where it broke, matching the
> bisection's results.
So it looks like not all systems suffer from this issue...
Please excuse me for the noize -- it really looked like the kernel
broke.
Thanks,
/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists