[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111226121207.GF8722@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:12:08 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya.rohm@...il.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Dimitris Papastamos <dp@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qi.wang@...el.com,
yong.y.wang@...el.com, joel.clark@...el.com, kok.howg.ewe@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] sound/soc/lapis: add platform driver for ML7213
IOH I2S
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 03:33:29PM +0900, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> 2011/12/22 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
> >> Not sorted but queuing only.
> >> In sound/voice control system, queuing is not rare, I think.
> >> If necessary, though this method is very common, I can send the method
> >> of the queue.
> > No, please describe the problem you're trying to fix.
> When CPU is heavy load, this buffer is useful.
> The heavy load causes delaying receiving processing.
> If there is no buffer, stream sound/voice can be broken.
> If there is the buffer, it can prevent the broken sound.
So you're just talking about standard underflows if the application
can't keep up? There's *no* reason for your driver to do anything about
this, it's a really basic thing that affects all audio hardware. Just
write a driver for the hardware.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists