| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 14:23:55 +0000 From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: devm_kfree On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 02:44:58PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > Is it reasonable to use devm_kfree in a probe function that fails or > a remove function that succeeds? If we need to do this I'd suggest that we should be fixing the manager to not need it rather than having drivers do this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists