linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: Do cpufreq clamping for throttling per package instead of per CPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111227214105.GA25565@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Tue, 27 Dec 2011 21:41:05 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: Do cpufreq clamping for throttling per
 package instead of per CPU

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:21:26PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:43:24PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 10:34:47PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > 
> > > +	if (reduction_pctg(policy->cpu))
> > > +		printk("cpufreq notifier %ld\n", event);
> > > +
> > 
> > Needed?
> 
> No, i'll drop it.

Thanks. Also, 3/4 didn't seem to make it to -kernel or -acpi.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/