[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111227072511.GA2250@netboy.at.omicron.at>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 08:25:11 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kumar Sundararajan <kumar@...com>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Add clock_gettime_ns syscall
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 08:51:00AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> This interface intentionally does not support sub-nanosecond
> precision. For one thing, light only travels about a foot per
> nanosecond, so nanoseconds are really pretty good for networking
> purposes. For another, 2^64 picoseconds (say) is a short enough
> interval to be inconvenient. If anyone needs sub-nanosecond
> precision for anything other than profiling, they're welcome to
> figure out an appropriate interface. For very precise profiling,
> "what time is it" is the wrong question, anyway -- modern CPUs can
> reorder things across time scales much longer than a nanosecond.
This paragraph probably should be updated, since you did add a padding
field for future sub-nanosecond reporting.
Also, on re-reading this, it seems silly to be to introduce a function
called "clock_gettime_ns" and then to say that this function cannot
answer the question, what time is it?
If the interface is a profiling only interface, then the name should
reflect this fact.
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists