linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Gang scheduling in CFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87obuuiatw.fsf@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:40:51 +0530
From:	Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, peterz@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Gang scheduling in CFS

On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:51:46 +0200, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 12/27/2011 11:44 AM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> > > > I am seeing a drop of ~44% when setting yield_on_hlt = 0
> > > >
> > > 
> > > A drop of 44% of what?
> > > 
> > records/sec
> >
> > Ebizzy - 2VM running in parallel, both having gang scheduling enabled.
> >
> >                     yield_on_hlt=1         yield_on_hlt=0
> >  EbzyRecords/sec      41955.50               23285.00            -44 
> >
> >
> 
> Interesting, are you overcommitting vcpus?
> 
Yes(1:2). On a 8cpu machine, have 2VMs running, which is 8vcpus each.

Regards
Nikunj

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/