[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111228211918.GA3516@google.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:19:18 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be
allowed to create io_context
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 09:55:12AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
> > "It's the tmpfs swapping test that I've been running, with variations,
> > for years. System booted with mem=700M and 1.5G swap, two repetitious
> > make -j20 kernel builds (of a 2.6.24 kernel: I stuck with that because
> > the balance of built to unbuilt source grows smaller with later kernels),
> > one directly in a tmpfs, the other in a 1k-block ext2 (that I drive with
> > ext4's CONFIG_EXT4_USE_FOR_EXT23) on /dev/loop0 on a 450MB tmpfs file."
> >
> > I doubt much of that (quoted from an older mail to someone else about
> > one of the many other bugs it's found) is relevant: maybe just plenty
> > of file I/O and swapping.
>
> Plain -j4 build isn't triggering anything. I'll try to replicate the condition.
It's not too reliable but I can reproduce it with -j 22 allmodconfig
build inside qemu w/ 512M of memory. I'll try to find out what's
going on.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists