[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111228180724.2c837aff6e65359abecddf78@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:07:24 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tmem tree with the vfs tree
Hi Dan,
Today's linux-next merge of the tmem tree got a conflict in fs/buffer.c
between commit b1cdabb05024 ("fs: move code out of buffer.c") from the
vfs tree and commit 294a90bcfd28 ("mm: cleancache: s/flush/invalidate/")
from the tmem tree.
The code that was modified by the latter was moved by the former. I
applied the following merge fixup patch.
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:05:28 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] tmem: fix up for code movement
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
fs/block_dev.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 69a5b6f..d6d5f29 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ void invalidate_bdev(struct block_device *bdev)
/* 99% of the time, we don't need to flush the cleancache on the bdev.
* But, for the strange corners, lets be cautious
*/
- cleancache_flush_inode(mapping);
+ cleancache_invalidate_inode(mapping);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(invalidate_bdev);
--
1.7.8.197.g73c6b
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists