[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111229161523.GB2300@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:15:23 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
Cc: Virtualization List <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] virtio: net: Add freeze, restore handlers to
support S4
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:58:33PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> Remove all the vqs, disable napi and detach from the netdev on
> hibernation.
>
> Re-create vqs after restoring from a hibernated image, re-enable napi
> and re-attach the netdev. This keeps networking working across
> hibernation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 7a2a5bf..b31670f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -1159,6 +1159,48 @@ static void __devexit virtnet_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> free_netdev(vi->dev);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int virtnet_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = vdev->priv;
> +
> + virtqueue_disable_cb(vi->rvq);
> + virtqueue_disable_cb(vi->svq);
> + if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ))
> + virtqueue_disable_cb(vi->cvq);
> +
> + netif_device_detach(vi->dev);
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
> +
> + if (netif_running(vi->dev))
> + napi_disable(&vi->napi);
> +
> + remove_vq_common(vi);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int virtnet_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = vdev->priv;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = init_vqs(vi);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + if (netif_running(vi->dev))
Can virtnet close run at this point?
If yes it's a bug.
> + virtnet_napi_enable(vi);
> +
> + netif_device_attach(vi->dev);
> +
Not that open/close start/stop refill,
I wonder whether this is a problem.
For example, can virtnet_close run at this point,
and cancel refill?
> + if (!try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL))
> + schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
This needs to be switched to non reentrant wq too?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> { VIRTIO_ID_NET, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
> { 0 },
> @@ -1183,6 +1225,10 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_net_driver = {
> .probe = virtnet_probe,
> .remove = __devexit_p(virtnet_remove),
> .config_changed = virtnet_config_changed,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> + .freeze = virtnet_freeze,
> + .restore = virtnet_restore,
> +#endif
> };
>
> static int __init init(void)
> --
> 1.7.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists