[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111229171256.GA5955@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:12:56 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Kirill Tkhai <kirill.tkhai@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: SCHED_RR && time_slice
On 12/29, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>
> Thanks for the answers, Oleg.
>
> On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 17:59 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 12/23, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > >
> > > RT class uses its own fixed
> > > timeslice (in case of RR),
> >
> > which looks confusing too, btw.
> >
> > sched_set_scheduler() does not initialize rt.time_slice, and
> > INIT_TASK() sets time_slice = HZ (not DEF_TIMESLICE).
> >
>
> I talk about task_tick_rt().
me too ;)
> When time_slice is over, it is being
> renewed. New value is DEF_TIMESLICE. This happens in case of SCHED_RR
> class.
Yes, but I was talking about initial value of time_slice, when the
task switches to SCHED_RR.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists