lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:37:17 +0100
From:	Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gurligebis@...too.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	romieu@...zoreil.com, shemminger@...tta.com,
	bhutchings@...arflare.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, rl@...lgate.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] via-rhine: Fix hanging with high CPU load on low-end broads.

2011/12/30 Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <gurligebis@...too.org>:
> 2011/12/29 David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
>> From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
>> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:39:02 +0100
>>
>>> Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> :
>>> [...]
>>>> Feel free to try the extra "new year's eve week end is getting closer"
>>>> patch below (against net-next).
>>>>
>>>> You have been warned.
>>>
>>> The one below could be a bit better.
>>
>> Obviously you'll need to resolve the use of rp->lock as an IRQ safe lock
>> in {get,src}_wol() so that this lock is consistently used as a BH safe
>> lock.  Your "Huh?" comments make it clear you are aware of this TODO. :-)
>>
>> But other than that this patch looks good to me, just some testing and
>> debugging are needed.
>
> I got it to boot, had to revert another patch introduced in 3.1.5
> that's causing alot of people problems, but thats another talk :)
>
> It boots fine, untill it tries to bring up an interface, which causes
> it to fails with a kernel panic.
> Here is the output of the panic:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~gurligebis/kernel/panic.txt
>
> /Bjarke

Hmm, it seems like this problem isn't related to the driver, but
related to the current HEAD of net-next :)

Would it be a problem if I try and use the patch on top of a clean
3.1.6 kernel ?

/Bjarke

>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ