[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EFC3FA8.6020401@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:23:36 +0100
From: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...glemail.com>
CC: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Andrzej Prochyra <andrzej@...chyra.name>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Platform: samsung-laptop: add DMI information for Samsung
N150 Plus
On 12/26/2011 11:22 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Corentin Chary
> <corentin.chary@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 3:28 PM, David Herrmann
>> <dh.herrmann@...glemail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Matthew Garrett<mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 02:12:57PM +0000, Andrzej Prochyra wrote:
>>>>> 'acpi_video0' not functional. Brightness can be controlled through
>>>>> intel_backlight interface. There are 21 brightness levels and the
>>>>> backlight can be turned off.
>>>>
>>>> If acpi_video0 doesn't work then we either need to work out why it's not
>>>> working or make it vanish completely, so this patch isn't the correct
>>>> approach.
>>>
>>> Just to make clear, intel_backlight isn't working properly either. If
>>> my laptop boots with backlight at 50% then intel_backlight will only
>>> work in the range 0%-50% on my machine. If I use the samsung module to
>>> set it to 100% then intel_backlight works correctly in the range
>>> 0-100% until next reboot/suspend.
>>>
>>> So I'd recommend staying with the samsung module and disabling the
>>> acpi_backlight entirely. The samsung module is the only backlight
>>> control which works properly.
>>
>> Can I take a look at the DSDT to see how it's broken ?
>> If it's really not functional, then it should be added to the
>> blacklist in video_detect.c
>
> Raw and disassembled dsdt is attached.
Took a quick look but didn't find anything obvious. What happens exactly
with acpi_video0 ?
But if it's not possible to make it work, I'd propose that (not tested):
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
index 45d8097..5041924 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
@@ -132,6 +132,26 @@ find_video(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void
*context, void **rv)
return AE_OK;
}
+/* Force to use vendor driver when the ACPI device is known to be
+ * buggy */
+static int video_detect_force_vendor(const struct dmi_system_id *d)
+{
+ acpi_video_support |= ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT_DMI_VENDOR;
+}
+
+static struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] __initdata = {
+ {
+ .callback = video_detect_force_vendor,
+ .ident = "N150P",
+ .matches = {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR,
+ "SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD."),
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "N150P"),
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "N150P"),
+ },
+ },
+};
+
/*
* Returns the video capabilities of a specific ACPI graphics device
*
@@ -164,6 +184,8 @@ long acpi_video_get_capabilities(acpi_handle
graphics_handle)
* ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT_DMI_VENDOR;
*}
*/
+
+ dmi_check_system(video_detect_dmi_table);
} else {
status = acpi_bus_get_device(graphics_handle, &tmp_dev);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
--
Corentin Chary
http://xf.iksaif.net/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists