lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:05:07 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Łukasz Michalik <lmi@....uni.wroc.pl>,
	"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
Subject: Re: Possible bug introduced in commit 9b84cca

On 12/29, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 12/28, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >
> > Looks like after commit 9b84cca, waitpid under strace
> > sometimes returns bogus ECHILD while child does exist.
> >
> > I did not yet confirm that the bug appeared exactly
> > at this commit - Łukasz says that.
> >
> > I confirmed that bug exists on kernels 3.1.6 (in Fedora)
> > and 3.1.0-rc4 (vanilla).
> >
> > We have a testcase which spawns N threads, each of them
> > performs an infinite loop "fork, exit in child, waitpid
> > in parent for the child". When straced, sometimes waitpid
> > returns ECHILD.
>
> You mean, the natural parent gets ECHILD, not strace?
>
> > The key part is here:
> >
> > 931   clone(child_stack=0, flags=CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID|SIGCHLD, child_tidptr=0xf763dbd8) = 1048
> > 1048  exit_group(42)                    = ?
> > 931   waitpid(1048,  <unfinished ...>
> > 1048  +++ exited with 42 +++
> > 931   <... waitpid resumed> 0xf763d3a0, 0) = -1 ECHILD (No child processes)
>
> Argh. I seem to understand
>
> I didn't check, but I think the offending commit is 823b018e5b1196d8
> "job control: Small reorganization of wait_consider_task()".
>
> ptracer sees EXIT_ZOMBIE and temporary sets EXIT_DEAD, this fools
> the ->real_parent.
>
> I need to think. The fix should be simple, but perhaps it is the
> time to kill EXIT_DEAD altogether. I'll try to make the patch
> after vacation. In the next year ;)
>
> Thanks a lot Denys!

I've made the simple test-case, it triggers the bug.

Oleg.

#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <assert.h>

int main(void)
{
	int pid, status;

	pid = fork();
	if (!pid) {
		for (;;) {
			if (!fork())
				return 0x23;
			assert(waitpid(-1, &status, 0) > 0);
			assert(status == 0x2300);
		}
	}

	assert(ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, pid, 0,0) == 0);
	assert(waitpid(-1, NULL, 0) == pid);

	assert(ptrace(PTRACE_SETOPTIONS, pid, 0, PTRACE_O_TRACEFORK) == 0);

	for (;;) {
		ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, pid, 0, 0);
		pid = waitpid(-1, NULL, 0);
		assert(pid > 0);
	}

	return 0;
}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ