linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] staging: zcache: fix serialization bug in zv stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0c787a22-68ed-49d9-816b-c9a9c1821772@default>
Date:	Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:31:17 -0800 (PST)
From:	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
To:	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] staging: zcache: fix serialization bug in zv stats

> From: Seth Jennings [mailto:sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: zcache: fix serialization bug in zv stats
> 
> On 12/30/2011 11:02 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> >> From: Seth Jennings [mailto:sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 9:42 AM
> >> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> >> Cc: Seth Jennings; Dan Magenheimer; Brian King; devel@...verdev.osuosl.org; linux-
> >> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> >> Subject: [PATCH] staging: zcache: fix serialization bug in zv stats
> >>
> >> In a multithreaded workload, the zv_curr_dist_counts
> >> and zv_cumul_dist_counts statistics are being corrupted
> >> because the increments and decrements in zv_create
> >> and zv_free are not atomic.
> >>
> >> This patch converts these statistics and their corresponding
> >> increments/decrements/reads to atomic operations.
> >>
> >> Based on v3.2-rc7
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > I'm inclined to nack this change, at least unless inside an #ifdef DEBUG,
> > as these counts are interesting to a developer but not useful to a normal
> > end user, whereas the incremental cost for atomic_inc and atomic_dec are
> > non-trivial.  I don't think any off-by-one in these counters could
> > result in a bug and, before promotion from staging, they probably
> > should just go away.  (They are fun to "watch -d" though ;-)
> 
> In my test, it hammers on particular chunk size and the counter is off
> by hundreds :-/
> 
> I too was worried about performance impact, however, my tests showed
> no degradation.  That's probably because there are bigger bottlenecks
> elsewhere.
> 
> Perhaps we can commit this for now, so that the code is correct, and
> revisit this when we try to replace zbud with zsmalloc.  I'm sure
> we'll have to rethink the statistics at that time.
> 
> The only other option, IMO, is the remove the chunk stats altogether
> until we can find a solution that is both fast and correct.
> 
> I think that continuing with incorrect stats, regardless of the degree
> to which they are incorrect, isn't really a viable option.

OK, well I guess as long as this is addressed before promotion
from staging, and until then the heaviest users will be developers
so I agree you are correct that accurate stats are a good thing.
So, consider my nack resolved and:

Acked-by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/