lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 14:32:48 +0100 From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com> Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: Pass name instead of device to pin_config_* On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com> wrote: > Linus Walleij wrote at Sunday, December 18, 2011 3:27 PM: >> >> I had to fix it up a bit to match the other >> refactoring patch I made so check the result in my tree or -next. > > Yes, I think that looks fine, thanks. > > Thanks for fixing up the documentation for me too. > > BTW, do you know which commits you're planning on you're planning on > sending to mainline during the next merge window? If it includes these > two patches, Yes, everything that has landed in -next will be sent upstream, including this. > I may be able to convert Tegra over to using the new pinctrl > driver in 3.3. And is your for-next branch stable (i.e. never rebased) > so that the arm-soc tree can use it as a dependency for my patches? It is rebased infrequently, and never this late in the -rc series. I may add fixes on top though. The for-next branch is basically a subset of devel excluding any controversial stuff, so up to a certain point, then I keep the under discussion stuff on top of for-next. Thanks, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists