lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 1 Jan 2012 14:58:21 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Dong Aisheng-B29396 <B29396@...escale.com>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc:	"linus.walleij@...ricsson.com" <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Guo Shawn-R65073 <r65073@...escale.com>,
	"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	"cjb@...top.org" <cjb@...top.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] dt: add of_get_child_count helper function

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Dong Aisheng-B29396
<B29396@...escale.com> wrote:
>> On 12/20/2011 11:40 AM, Dong Aisheng wrote:
>> > From: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>
>> >
>> > Currently most code to get child count in kernel are almost same, add
>> > a helper to implement this function for dt to use.
>> >
>> > ---
>> > Changes v1->v2:
>> >  * change the name from of_get_child_number to of_get_child_count
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>
>> > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
>> > Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>>
>> I assume you want this to go in with the rest of the series? If not, let me know.
>>
>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>>
>> Rob
>>
> Yes, since other patches in this series depend on this patch.
> Thanks for the review.

Does that mean the entire shebang needs to be merged through the
pinctrl subsystem?

If this patch stands on it's own, I think it's proper to merge it into
the DT for-next tree now, since we don't know if this entire series
will make it into the next merge window.

If the patch would anyway happen to end up in two trees,
no big deal.

Rob, can you merge it?

Thanks,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists