| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:58:15 +0000 From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: Ashish Chavan <ashish.chavan@...tcummins.com> Cc: lrg <lrg@...com>, alsa-devel <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, "kuninori.morimoto.gx" <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>, David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v8 3/3 RESEND] ASoC: da7210: Add support for line input and mic On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 06:10:02PM +0530, Ashish Chavan wrote: > I see, I was not aware of this norm. I just thought that not changing > the subject line may help in identifying multiple submissions of the > same patch. No, that's what the human readable portion is for. > BTW, should the version info be also dropped in case if we consider this > as a new, independent patch? Because many of the version increments were > just because of changes in other, earlier patches in the series. Personally I find the versioning information a waste of time in the first place, it just obscures more of the subject line in mail readers. A patch is going to be considered on its merits no matter how many times it's been sent before, having a version number is often just depressing (as with those PMIC patches). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists