[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120102125815.GI4300@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:58:15 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Ashish Chavan <ashish.chavan@...tcummins.com>
Cc: lrg <lrg@...com>, alsa-devel <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"kuninori.morimoto.gx" <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v8 3/3 RESEND] ASoC: da7210: Add support for
line input and mic
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 06:10:02PM +0530, Ashish Chavan wrote:
> I see, I was not aware of this norm. I just thought that not changing
> the subject line may help in identifying multiple submissions of the
> same patch.
No, that's what the human readable portion is for.
> BTW, should the version info be also dropped in case if we consider this
> as a new, independent patch? Because many of the version increments were
> just because of changes in other, earlier patches in the series.
Personally I find the versioning information a waste of time in the
first place, it just obscures more of the subject line in mail readers.
A patch is going to be considered on its merits no matter how many times
it's been sent before, having a version number is often just depressing
(as with those PMIC patches).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists