[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMgXRev24e0bmGD71J04=Aon7bs0YeK7mwX8Na12uR_b6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 23:01:27 -0800
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Circular dependency between <linux/kernel.h> and <asm/bug.h> on ARM
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk> wrote:
> Commit 87e040b6456fd3416a1f6831c1eedaef5c0a94ff ("ARM: 7017/1: Use
> generic BUG() handler") makes BUG() use BUILD_BUG_ON(). However,
> BUILD_BUG_ON() is not defined in <linux/bug.h> but in <linux/kernel.h>.
>
> arch/include/asm/bug.h does not include <linux/kernel.h> and *cannot* do
> so because the latter already includes <asm/bug.h>.
Sure it can, but it's not ideal. Since the BUILD_BUG_ON is only used
in bug.h in a #define, it will be resolved below the includes of
either so there should be no ordering issue between the two.
I coincidentally posted a patch earlier to do just that, I didn't see
your email until later.
> Maybe BUILD_BUG_ON() should be moved out to a header of its own, or else
> this particular use should be moved to some other file. This needs to
> be fixed somehow, as it obviously leads to build failures, e.g.:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=linux-2.6&arch=armel&ver=3.2~rc7-1~experimental.1&stamp=1325142904
Or perhaps moving BUILD_BUG_ON to include/linux/bug.h?
The quickest fix for now might be to take out the BUILD_BUG_ON(),
especially so close to 3.2-final.
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists