linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] intel_mid_dma: remove legacy pm interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1325502355.1540.11.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Date:	Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:35:55 +0530
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_mid_dma: remove legacy pm interface

On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 09:55 +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 23/12/11 18:19, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 22:32 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> >> From: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>
> >>
> >> Drivers should not support both legacy pm and new framework.
> > Not really.
> > 
> > I am using this driver in our system where we go to D0i3 aka
> > runtime_suspend when DMA is idle.
> > Also we goto D3/S3 aka when traditional suspend is invoked.
> > 
> > So we need both.
> 
> There is no functional change caused by this patch.
> 
> It simply moves suspend/resume calls into dev_pm_ops
> where they really belong now.  It is necessary to prevent
> kernel warnings.
Somehow I didn't read the patch correctly in first place.

Applied now, Thanks

-- 
~Vinod

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/