lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:41:34 +0000
From:	Jack Stone <jwjstone@...tmail.fm>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
	Chaoming Li <chaoming_li@...lsil.com.cn>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Wireless List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: loading firmware while usermodehelper disabled.



Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

>> So we have a table of USB ids that list the devices that need
>firmware drivers. When the uvcvideo driver registers the firmware
>interface with a USB id that matches the list we load the firmware
>driver and pass it a "warm start" event so it can cache the firmware.
>> 
>> As long as we can identify the devices that *might* need firmware
>then we are ok.
>
>You just broke the module loading guarantees that stop it all coming
>apart
>in the first place. Probably not in many real world ways but not good.
>
>If we warm booted from Windows into Linux and then suspended then on
>resume we won't have the driver for the firmware loaded present - we
>never saw the 'need firmware' id.

I agree we won't see the need firmware id but we should still be able to identify the device from some of its ids shouldn't we? We could then cache the firmware even though we never loaded it.

>That moves us from a dependancy chain for firmware to one including
>firmware and modules (imagine /lib/modules over iscsi for an iscsi
>adapter needing firmware).
>
>At the moment I don't think anyone has been dumb enough to do firmware
>requiring storage and NFS root over firmware requiring USB devices is
>pretty dumb. I don't however think it's a good hole to dig ?

I'm sure someone will try it at somepoint...

Thanks,

Jack

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ