linux-kernel - Re: Reiserfs.c bug in 3.2-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzwq6XiAnX26uV+-mNsbGbnj0S=4nP5avPqKPw8OT+cmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 Jan 2012 08:48:58 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, haiyangz@...rosoft.com,
	hjanssen@...rosoft.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Jorge Bastos <mysql.jorge@...imal.pt>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
Subject: Re: Reiserfs.c bug in 3.2-rc5

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Commit fb88c2b changed the security_old_inode_init_security() return
> code for S_PRIVATE inodes. As long as -EOPNOTSUPP is expected, probably
> should revert that as well.
>
> (I'm cc'ing the ocfs2 maintainers.)

Jan, Joel? Can you confirm? I was planning on doing 3.2 today, but
maybe I can't, or maybe we need to punt this to be a stable patch.

But maybe we can have quick testing and agreement? Does everybody
agree on both Honza's patch *and* revert of fb88c2b? Does the
EOPNOTSUPP return case match what we used to do?

                          Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/