[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120103203357.GD17472@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:33:57 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: "ustc.mail" <backyes@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 【Question】Whether it's legal to enable same physical DMA memory
mapped for different NIC device?
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 10:16:40PM +0800, ustc.mail wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> In NIC driver, to eliminate the overhead of dma_map_single() for DMA
> packet data, we have statically allocated huge DMA memory buffer ring
> at once instead of calling dma_map_single() per packet. Considering
> to further reduce the copy overhead between different NIC(port) ring
> while forwarding, one packet from a input NIC(port) will be
> transferred to output NIC(port) with no any copy action.
>
> To satisfy this requirement, the packet memory should be mapped into
> input port and unmapped when leaving input port, then mapped into
> output port and unmapped later.
>
> Whether it's legal to map the same DMA memory into input and output
> port simultaneously? If it's not, then the zero-copy for packet
> forwarding is not feasible?
>
Did you ever a get a response about this?
Is the output/input port on a seperate device function? Or is it
just a specific MMIO BAR in your PCI device?
> Hope PCI expert to post your suggestion.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --Yanfei
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists