[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120103213830.GG2376@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:38:30 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: INFO: task rcuc/0:7 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 12:37:17PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 12:27:16PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 08:29:59PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:13:23AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 08:31 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > Except that when I try looking for task_notify_func() in current mainline,
> > > > > I get nothing.
> > > > >
> > > > > Where is task_notify_func() coming from?
> > > >
> > > > I was testing linux-next, it actually comes from the android tree:
> > > > drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
> > >
> > > That does sound familiar... I wonder if the stuff in staging is current
> > > Android or historical stuff.
> >
> > And memory did serve for once. ;-)
> >
> > Current Android has the following for task_notify_func():
> >
> > static int
> > task_notify_func(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long val, void *data)
> > {
> > struct task_struct *task = data;
> >
> > if (task == lowmem_deathpending)
> > lowmem_deathpending = NULL;
> >
> > return NOTIFY_OK;
> > }
> >
> > This is from https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common.git.
> >
> > Commit 5545554aac04918ece318270d63cbfcb015577a9 fixed this problem.
> > The commit is shown below, FYI.
> >
> > Greg, would it be possible to pull in the current Android code? There
> > have been a few fixes. ;-)
>
> I did base the stuff in staging on the common.git tree, but for some
> reason this patch wasn't applied, odd, I'll go apply it now...
>
> Ah, I see, it didn't apply for various reasons:
>
> patching file drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 71.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 168.
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 196 (offset 11 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 204 (offset 11 lines).
>
> Care to rebase this patch and send it to me so that I can apply it? I
> don't have the time to do it myself at the moment, sorry, lots of higher
> priority items to get done this week, sorry.
I will give it a shot. Working with linux-next -- if some other tree
would be better for you, please let me know.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists