[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120103223505.GI31746@google.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 14:35:05 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be
allowed to create io_context
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:13:01PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > That's pretty odd. Given Hughs report as well, it sure does sound like
> > we now have some life time issues with cfqq's.
>
> Hmmm... I disabled cfqq merge logic (commented out
> cfq_close_cooperator() and the following cfq_setup_merge() calls) in
> cfq_select_queue() and neither is triggering for quite a while now.
> Maybe cfqq refcnt is getting borked over cfqq merging / splitting? It
> would also explain the low frequency of the issue too. I'll try to
> further isolate it but It would be awesome if someone more familiar
> with the logic can go over that part.
Scrap that. It triggered and yeah cfq_get_next_queue() is retrieving
empty cfqq from the service tree.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists