[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120103223326.534507407@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:33:38 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [65/75] sch_gred: should not use GFP_KERNEL while holding a spinlock
3.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit 3f1e6d3fd37bd4f25e5b19f1c7ca21850426c33f ]
gred_change_vq() is called under sch_tree_lock(sch).
This means a spinlock is held, and we are not allowed to sleep in this
context.
We might pre-allocate memory using GFP_KERNEL before taking spinlock,
but this is not suitable for stable material.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
net/sched/sch_gred.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/sched/sch_gred.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_gred.c
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static inline int gred_change_vq(struct
struct gred_sched_data *q;
if (table->tab[dp] == NULL) {
- table->tab[dp] = kzalloc(sizeof(*q), GFP_KERNEL);
+ table->tab[dp] = kzalloc(sizeof(*q), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (table->tab[dp] == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists