| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20120103223327.055129288@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:33:44 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [71/75] net: introduce DST_NOPEER dst flag
3.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit e688a604807647c9450f9c12a7cb6d027150a895 ]
Chris Boot reported crashes occurring in ipv6_select_ident().
[ 461.457562] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff812dde61>] [<ffffffff812dde61>]
ipv6_select_ident+0x31/0xa7
[ 461.578229] Call Trace:
[ 461.580742] <IRQ>
[ 461.582870] [<ffffffff812efa7f>] ? udp6_ufo_fragment+0x124/0x1a2
[ 461.589054] [<ffffffff812dbfe0>] ? ipv6_gso_segment+0xc0/0x155
[ 461.595140] [<ffffffff812700c6>] ? skb_gso_segment+0x208/0x28b
[ 461.601198] [<ffffffffa03f236b>] ? ipv6_confirm+0x146/0x15e
[nf_conntrack_ipv6]
[ 461.608786] [<ffffffff81291c4d>] ? nf_iterate+0x41/0x77
[ 461.614227] [<ffffffff81271d64>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x357/0x543
[ 461.620659] [<ffffffff81291cf6>] ? nf_hook_slow+0x73/0x111
[ 461.626440] [<ffffffffa0379745>] ? br_parse_ip_options+0x19a/0x19a
[bridge]
[ 461.633581] [<ffffffff812722ff>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x3af/0x459
[ 461.639577] [<ffffffffa03747d2>] ? br_dev_queue_push_xmit+0x72/0x76
[bridge]
[ 461.646887] [<ffffffffa03791e3>] ? br_nf_post_routing+0x17d/0x18f
[bridge]
[ 461.653997] [<ffffffff81291c4d>] ? nf_iterate+0x41/0x77
[ 461.659473] [<ffffffffa0374760>] ? br_flood+0xfa/0xfa [bridge]
[ 461.665485] [<ffffffff81291cf6>] ? nf_hook_slow+0x73/0x111
[ 461.671234] [<ffffffffa0374760>] ? br_flood+0xfa/0xfa [bridge]
[ 461.677299] [<ffffffffa0379215>] ?
nf_bridge_update_protocol+0x20/0x20 [bridge]
[ 461.684891] [<ffffffffa03bb0e5>] ? nf_ct_zone+0xa/0x17 [nf_conntrack]
[ 461.691520] [<ffffffffa0374760>] ? br_flood+0xfa/0xfa [bridge]
[ 461.697572] [<ffffffffa0374812>] ? NF_HOOK.constprop.8+0x3c/0x56
[bridge]
[ 461.704616] [<ffffffffa0379031>] ?
nf_bridge_push_encap_header+0x1c/0x26 [bridge]
[ 461.712329] [<ffffffffa037929f>] ? br_nf_forward_finish+0x8a/0x95
[bridge]
[ 461.719490] [<ffffffffa037900a>] ?
nf_bridge_pull_encap_header+0x1c/0x27 [bridge]
[ 461.727223] [<ffffffffa0379974>] ? br_nf_forward_ip+0x1c0/0x1d4 [bridge]
[ 461.734292] [<ffffffff81291c4d>] ? nf_iterate+0x41/0x77
[ 461.739758] [<ffffffffa03748cc>] ? __br_deliver+0xa0/0xa0 [bridge]
[ 461.746203] [<ffffffff81291cf6>] ? nf_hook_slow+0x73/0x111
[ 461.751950] [<ffffffffa03748cc>] ? __br_deliver+0xa0/0xa0 [bridge]
[ 461.758378] [<ffffffffa037533a>] ? NF_HOOK.constprop.4+0x56/0x56
[bridge]
This is caused by bridge netfilter special dst_entry (fake_rtable), a
special shared entry, where attaching an inetpeer makes no sense.
Problem is present since commit 87c48fa3b46 (ipv6: make fragment
identifications less predictable)
Introduce DST_NOPEER dst flag and make sure ipv6_select_ident() and
__ip_select_ident() fallback to the 'no peer attached' handling.
Reported-by: Chris Boot <bootc@...tc.net>
Tested-by: Chris Boot <bootc@...tc.net>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
include/net/dst.h | 1 +
net/bridge/br_netfilter.c | 2 +-
net/ipv4/route.c | 4 ++--
net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/include/net/dst.h
+++ b/include/net/dst.h
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct dst_entry {
#define DST_NOHASH 0x0008
#define DST_NOCACHE 0x0010
#define DST_NOCOUNT 0x0020
+#define DST_NOPEER 0x0040
short error;
short obsolete;
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ void br_netfilter_rtable_init(struct net
rt->dst.dev = br->dev;
rt->dst.path = &rt->dst;
dst_init_metrics(&rt->dst, br_dst_default_metrics, true);
- rt->dst.flags = DST_NOXFRM;
+ rt->dst.flags = DST_NOXFRM | DST_NOPEER;
rt->dst.ops = &fake_dst_ops;
}
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@ void __ip_select_ident(struct iphdr *iph
{
struct rtable *rt = (struct rtable *) dst;
- if (rt) {
+ if (rt && !(rt->dst.flags & DST_NOPEER)) {
if (rt->peer == NULL)
rt_bind_peer(rt, rt->rt_dst, 1);
@@ -1283,7 +1283,7 @@ void __ip_select_ident(struct iphdr *iph
iph->id = htons(inet_getid(rt->peer, more));
return;
}
- } else
+ } else if (!rt)
printk(KERN_DEBUG "rt_bind_peer(0) @%p\n",
__builtin_return_address(0));
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ void ipv6_select_ident(struct frag_hdr *
static atomic_t ipv6_fragmentation_id;
int old, new;
- if (rt) {
+ if (rt && !(rt->dst.flags & DST_NOPEER)) {
struct inet_peer *peer;
if (!rt->rt6i_peer)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists