[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120103223032.320031394@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:29:30 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [12/67] block: initialize request_queues numa node during
3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
commit 5151412dd4338b273afdb107c3772528e9e67d92 upstream.
struct request_queue is allocated with __GFP_ZERO so its "node" field is
zero before initialization. This causes an oops if node 0 is offline in
the page allocator because its zonelists are not initialized. From Dave
Young's dmesg:
SRAT: Node 1 PXM 2 0-d0000000
SRAT: Node 1 PXM 2 100000000-330000000
SRAT: Node 0 PXM 1 330000000-630000000
Initmem setup node 1 0000000000000000-000000000affb000
...
Built 1 zonelists in Node order, mobility grouping on.
...
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000000001c08
IP: [<ffffffff8111c355>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xb5/0x870
and __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xb5 translates to a NULL pointer on
zonelist->_zonerefs.
The fix is to initialize q->node at the time of allocation so the correct
node is passed to the slab allocator later.
Since blk_init_allocated_queue_node() is no longer needed, merge it with
blk_init_allocated_queue().
[rientjes@...gle.com: changelog, initializing q->node]
Reported-by: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
block/blk-core.c | 14 +++-----------
include/linux/blkdev.h | 3 ---
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue_no
q->backing_dev_info.state = 0;
q->backing_dev_info.capabilities = BDI_CAP_MAP_COPY;
q->backing_dev_info.name = "block";
+ q->node = node_id;
err = bdi_init(&q->backing_dev_info);
if (err) {
@@ -502,7 +503,7 @@ blk_init_queue_node(request_fn_proc *rfn
if (!uninit_q)
return NULL;
- q = blk_init_allocated_queue_node(uninit_q, rfn, lock, node_id);
+ q = blk_init_allocated_queue(uninit_q, rfn, lock);
if (!q)
blk_cleanup_queue(uninit_q);
@@ -514,18 +515,9 @@ struct request_queue *
blk_init_allocated_queue(struct request_queue *q, request_fn_proc *rfn,
spinlock_t *lock)
{
- return blk_init_allocated_queue_node(q, rfn, lock, -1);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_init_allocated_queue);
-
-struct request_queue *
-blk_init_allocated_queue_node(struct request_queue *q, request_fn_proc *rfn,
- spinlock_t *lock, int node_id)
-{
if (!q)
return NULL;
- q->node = node_id;
if (blk_init_free_list(q))
return NULL;
@@ -555,7 +547,7 @@ blk_init_allocated_queue_node(struct req
return NULL;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_init_allocated_queue_node);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_init_allocated_queue);
int blk_get_queue(struct request_queue *q)
{
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -798,9 +798,6 @@ extern void blk_unprep_request(struct re
*/
extern struct request_queue *blk_init_queue_node(request_fn_proc *rfn,
spinlock_t *lock, int node_id);
-extern struct request_queue *blk_init_allocated_queue_node(struct request_queue *,
- request_fn_proc *,
- spinlock_t *, int node_id);
extern struct request_queue *blk_init_queue(request_fn_proc *, spinlock_t *);
extern struct request_queue *blk_init_allocated_queue(struct request_queue *,
request_fn_proc *, spinlock_t *);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists