linux-kernel - linux-next: interesting merges in the arm-soc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120104104758.26b0ca5268d10fbf7b95903a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:47:58 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: linux-next: interesting merges in the arm-soc tree

Hi all,

I noticed that the arm-soc tree has merged in the v4l-dvb and the
slave-dma trees today.   Is there some good reason for this?  It fixes a
few conflicts (but that is not excuse) and there may be dependencies in a
driver on the v4l-dvb tree (but maybe that means that that driver should
be merged via the v4l-dvb tree - it looks like the "at91/drivers" is
based on the v4l-dvb tree, so probably doesn't depend on anything else on
the arm-soc tree).

If nothing else, are you sure that neither of those merged trees will
rebase?  You have also just inherited any bugs in those two trees.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped