[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120103065659.GA32216@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 07:56:59 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>
Cc: Guillem Jover <guillem@...rons.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use __unused0 instead of __unused for user visible
struct member names
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 02:22:43PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> (+cc: some possible relevant people)
> Hi,
>
> Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> > On BSD systems __unused has traditionally been defined to mean the
> > equivalent of gcc's __attribute__((__unused__)), some parts of the
> > Linux tree use that convention too (e.g. perf). The problem comes when
> > defining such macro while trying to build unmodified source code with
> > BSD origins on systems with Linux headers.
> >
> > Rename the user visible struct members from __unused to __unused0 to
> > not cause compilation failures due to that macro, which should not be
> > a problem as those members are supposed to be private anyway.
^__ is reserved for libc internal stuff and there is no reason to
name the unused/padding members "__unused".
So one or a set of patches that rename them all to something more
sensible would be fine.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists