[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJuYYwSAsPYibZsgdHQzMba-wCymRxqqcmtZSZi7A_AzTJv5tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:56:58 +0530
From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
rpurdie@...ys.net, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
kgene.kim@...sung.com, jg1.han@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, cbou@...l.ru, kwangwoo.lee@...il.com,
augulis.darius@...il.com, ben-linux@...ff.org, patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] lcd: platform-lcd: Eliminate need for platform data
On 2 January 2012 23:43, Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 11:21:46PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>
>> Your point on maintaining support for both old and new formats is
>> helpful. But I am not sure if maintaining support for both formats is
>> the right thing to do. As most of the ARM platforms will switch to
>> using dt, maybe converting all of them to new format would be better.
>> I will try doing this and prepare a patch.
>
> There's more architectures than ARM supported in Linux and only a
> minority of them are using device tree at the minute. Unless every
> architecture switches over platform data based users will still need to
> be supported.
I will try to retain the old platform data style also since there are
support for lcd panels in mainline that use 2 or more gpios in a panel
specific way. And it would be difficult to fold them into a generic
lcd type for lcd power control.
Thanks,
Thomas.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists