[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6D8AF2A@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:36:34 -0000
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc: <mingo@...e.hu>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Christoph Lameter" <cl@...ux.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86: fix and improve cmpxchg_double{,_local}()
> BTW atomic64_set() asm() contraints are wrong :
>
> static inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i)
> {
> unsigned high = (unsigned)(i >> 32);
> unsigned low = (unsigned)i;
> asm volatile(ATOMIC64_ALTERNATIVE(set)
> : "+b" (low), "+c" (high)
> : "S" (v)
> : "eax", "edx", "memory"
> );
> }
>
>
> ebx/ecx registers are not modified by cmpxchg8b (or the
> atomic64_set_386 emulation). Only eax/edx can be modified.
Isn't it also possible to constrain the "memory"
constraint to only apply to '*v' not all of memory?
I can't remember the syntax off hand though...
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists