[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F049DEA.30506@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:43:54 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: serial ports now asserting DTR and RTS during boot; breaks connected
hardware
On 01/03/2012 05:13 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:00:45PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 01/03/2012 04:37 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > Jiri,
> > > We got this report from a user who notes a change in behaviour for
> > > his serial hardware over the last few kernel versions.
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm busy right now, however just after a quick look, it may be related to:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/6/573
> >
> > I'll take a look later.
>
> thanks. I'll dig a little deeper.
>
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771010
> > >
> > > This sounds like it might be related to your DTR/RTS changes back in March 2011 maybe ?
> >
> > What changes do you mean? In serial-core.c? Thaat one is not used by USB
> > serials. Hence this wouldn't occur with FTDI.
>
> yeah, 303a7a1199c20f7c9452f024a6e17bf348b6b398 and c7d7abff40c27f82fe78b1091ab3fad69b2546f9
> jumped out at me, as they were they only things that changed DTR/RTS handling
> (at least mentioned in changelog) in recent times.
Rollback. The two commits are about uart. So they don't as well affect FTDI.
> The user mentions that it also affects 8250, though your point may mean
> that this is caused by something further up in the serial/tty code.
Or userspace. Try what Alan suggested. And ensure that FTDI is really
affected. Sometimes bug reporters do mistakes.
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists