linux-kernel - [PATCH] gpio: pl061: remove combined interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1325705506-24230-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed,  4 Jan 2012 13:31:46 -0600
From:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>,
	Rajeev Kumar <rajeev-dlh.kumar@...com>,
	Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: pl061: remove combined interrupt

From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>

Drivers should not have a dependency on NR_IRQS. Doing so may break with
SPARSE_IRQ enabled. As there are no in kernel users of the pl061 which
have multiple instances with their interrupts combined to a single parent
interrupt, remove this functionality. If this capability is needed later,
it could be supported more cleanly by just using a devicetree property.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
Cc: Rajeev Kumar <rajeev-dlh.kumar@...com>
Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c |   44 ++++++++------------------------------------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c
index fe19dec..ee0e4b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/ioport.h>
 #include <linux/irq.h>
@@ -37,13 +36,6 @@
 #define PL061_GPIO_NR	8
 
 struct pl061_gpio {
-	/* We use a list of pl061_gpio structs for each trigger IRQ in the main
-	 * interrupts controller of the system. We need this to support systems
-	 * in which more that one PL061s are connected to the same IRQ. The ISR
-	 * interates through this list to find the source of the interrupt.
-	 */
-	struct list_head	list;
-
 	/* Each of the two spinlocks protects a different set of hardware
 	 * regiters and data structurs. This decouples the code of the IRQ from
 	 * the GPIO code. This also makes the case of a GPIO routine call from
@@ -209,26 +201,20 @@ static struct irq_chip pl061_irqchip = {
 
 static void pl061_irq_handler(unsigned irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
-	struct list_head *chip_list = irq_get_handler_data(irq);
-	struct list_head *ptr;
-	struct pl061_gpio *chip;
+	unsigned long pending;
+	int offset;
+	struct pl061_gpio *chip = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
 	struct irq_chip *irqchip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
 
 	chained_irq_enter(irqchip, desc);
-	list_for_each(ptr, chip_list) {
-		unsigned long pending;
-		int offset;
-
-		chip = list_entry(ptr, struct pl061_gpio, list);
-		pending = readb(chip->base + GPIOMIS);
-		writeb(pending, chip->base + GPIOIC);
-
-		if (pending == 0)
-			continue;
 
+	pending = readb(chip->base + GPIOMIS);
+	writeb(pending, chip->base + GPIOIC);
+	if (pending) {
 		for_each_set_bit(offset, &pending, PL061_GPIO_NR)
 			generic_handle_irq(pl061_to_irq(&chip->gc, offset));
 	}
+
 	chained_irq_exit(irqchip, desc);
 }
 
@@ -236,9 +222,7 @@ static int pl061_probe(struct amba_device *dev, const struct amba_id *id)
 {
 	struct pl061_platform_data *pdata;
 	struct pl061_gpio *chip;
-	struct list_head *chip_list;
 	int ret, irq, i;
-	static DECLARE_BITMAP(init_irq, NR_IRQS);
 
 	chip = kzalloc(sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (chip == NULL)
@@ -270,7 +254,6 @@ static int pl061_probe(struct amba_device *dev, const struct amba_id *id)
 
 	spin_lock_init(&chip->lock);
 	spin_lock_init(&chip->irq_lock);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&chip->list);
 
 	chip->gc.direction_input = pl061_direction_input;
 	chip->gc.direction_output = pl061_direction_output;
@@ -300,18 +283,7 @@ static int pl061_probe(struct amba_device *dev, const struct amba_id *id)
 		goto iounmap;
 	}
 	irq_set_chained_handler(irq, pl061_irq_handler);
-	if (!test_and_set_bit(irq, init_irq)) { /* list initialized? */
-		chip_list = kmalloc(sizeof(*chip_list), GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (chip_list == NULL) {
-			clear_bit(irq, init_irq);
-			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			goto iounmap;
-		}
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(chip_list);
-		irq_set_handler_data(irq, chip_list);
-	} else
-		chip_list = irq_get_handler_data(irq);
-	list_add(&chip->list, chip_list);
+	irq_set_handler_data(irq, chip);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < PL061_GPIO_NR; i++) {
 		if (pdata) {
-- 
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/