[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1201041431160.1505-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:41:12 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: Re: Sysfs attributes racing with unregistration
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Someone (I think Eric, right?) was trying to generalize the semantics
> > to vfs layer so that severance/revocation capability is generally
> > available. IIRC, it didn't get through tho.
>
> Unfortunately I didn't have time to complete the effort of those
> patches. The approach was not fundamentally rejected but it needed a
> clear and convincing use case as well as some strong scrutiny. But
> fundamentally finding a way to do that was seen as an interesting,
> if it could be solved without slowing down the existing cases.
Ted Ts'o has been talking about something similar but not the same -- a
way to revoke an entire filesystem. For example, see commit
7c2e70879fc0949b4220ee61b7c4553f6976a94d (ext4: add ext4-specific
kludge to avoid an oops after the disk disappears).
The use case for that is obvious and widespread: Somebody yanks out a
USB drive without unmounting it first.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists