lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPXgP11yiS5hF9q3+A1tyORmtp=z2T6CWBUDFh3FhcL19jADpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 4 Jan 2012 01:07:52 +0100
From:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 17:21, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 05:45:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Because of the powerpc problems above, I have used the driver-core tree
>> from next-20111222 for today.
>
> Sorry about all of the problems, we tried to fix everything we could,
> but your merges and cross-builds found stuff we missed :(
>
> Kay, care to send me patches to fix this, and all of the other
> linux-next-reported problems to me so we can get this resolved this
> week?

I rather don't want to add error checking to stuff that doesn't do it
today. The sysdev stuff never had that forced checks, but the normal
device stuff has.

I think the force return value check is really a pretty misguided idea
in general, and it's up to the caller to do these checks and handle
rollbacks, not the driver core, I think.

Can't we just remove that forced check?

Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ