lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120105075855.GD31895@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date:	Wed, 4 Jan 2012 23:58:55 -0800
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Christopher Heiny <cheiny@...aptics.com>
Cc:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	Joerie de Gram <j.de.gram@...il.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Naveen Kumar Gaddipati <naveen.gaddipati@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] input: Synaptics RMI4 Touchscreen Driver

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 06:09:51PM -0800, Christopher Heiny wrote:
> This patch implements a driver supporting Synaptics ClearPad and other
> touchscreen sensors that use the RMI4 protocol, as defined here:
> 
>     http://www.synaptics.com/sites/default/files/511-000136-01-Rev-E-RMI4%20Intrfacing%20Guide.pdf
> 
> as well as successor documents that haven't made their way through to
> publication yet.
> 
> This code represents a complete refactoring and rewrite of the previously
> submitted patches, and supersedes all those patches.  We believe that all
> outstanding issues arising from the previous submissions have been addressed.
> However, because of the quantity of new code, we are submitting this patch
> as an RFC and requesting feedback from the kernel community.
> 
> 
> This patch is against the v2.6.38 tag of Linus' kernel tree, commit
> 521cb40b0c44418a4fd36dc633f575813d59a43d.
> 
> 
> Included in this patch are:
>     - full support for an RMI virtual bus as a standard kernel bus
> 
>     - physical layer implementations for I2C and SPI
> 
>     - function implementations for the following RMI4 functions:
>         * F01 device control
>         * F09 self test (aka BIST)
>         * F11 multifinger pointing
>         * F19 capacitive buttons
>         * F34 device reflash
>         * F54 analog data reporting
> 
>     - character device access to the RMI4 register map via rmidev

Could you please tell me why this facility is needed?

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ