[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120105002336.GA30069@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:23:36 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: cleanup prohibition of direct opening for unix98
pty master
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 12:51:11PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> cleanup hack added in v2.6.27-3203-g15582d3
>
> comment from that patch:
>
> : pty: If the administrator creates a device for a ptmx slave we should not error
> :
> : The open path for ptmx slaves is via the ptmx device. Opening them any
> : other way is not allowed. Vegard Nossum found that previously this was not
> : the case and mknod foo c 128 42; cat foo would produce nasty diagnostics
> :
> : Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
> : Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>
> devpts_get_tty() returns non-null only for inodes on devpts, but there is no
> inodes for master-devices, /dev/ptmx (/dev/pts/ptmx) is the only way to open them.
> Thus we can completely forbid lookup for master-devices and eliminate that hack in
> tty_init_dev() because tty_open() will get EIO from tty_driver_lookup_tty().
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
What tree did you make this patch against? I get fuzz warnings when
applying it to the tty-next branch (it's in the linux-next releases).
Please rediff it and resend it.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists