lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:22:51 +0000
From:	<leonid.moiseichuk@...ia.com>
To:	<riel@...hat.com>, <gregkh@...e.de>
CC:	<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<cesarb@...arb.net>, <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	<emunson@...bm.net>, <penberg@...nel.org>, <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	<mel@....ul.ie>, <rientjes@...gle.com>, <dima@...roid.com>,
	<rebecca@...roid.com>, <san@...gle.com>,
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <vesa.jaaskelainen@...ia.com>,
	<minchan@...hat.com>, <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3.2.0-rc1 0/3] Used Memory Meter pseudo-device and
 related changes in MM

Hi,

We (small and embedded) needs some mechanism to notify userspace that memory consumption is going to be high to allow react properly and keep device fast and stable:  close big graphics, shuts something not used, stop processing data etc.  If we not able to do it in the right moment OOM killer starts to work and applications just disappears which is not nice for user in all cases. So the proposed code is not replacement of OOM killer at all but, yes, could be recognized as part of "cooperative-oom". 

Since n900 we tried to use memcg and notifications. Unfortunately memcg is not nice suitable to handling processes due to how memory is accounted: taking into account caches produce false-positive notifications plus stability issues which could be result of outdated 2.6.32 kernel e.g. unnecessary swapping overhead when big process moved from one group to another or even device hung.  

With Best Wishes,
Leonid


-----Original Message-----
From: ext Rik van Riel [mailto:riel@...hat.com] 
Sent: 04 January, 2012 22:18
To: Greg KH
Cc: Moiseichuk Leonid (Nokia-MP/Helsinki); linux-mm@...ck.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; cesarb@...arb.net; kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com; emunson@...bm.net; penberg@...nel.org; aarcange@...hat.com; mel@....ul.ie; rientjes@...gle.com; dima@...roid.com; rebecca@...roid.com; san@...gle.com; akpm@...ux-foundation.org; Jaaskelainen Vesa (Nokia-MP/Helsinki); Minchan Kim; KOSAKI Motohiro
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2.0-rc1 0/3] Used Memory Meter pseudo-device and related changes in MM

On 01/04/2012 02:56 PM, Greg KH wrote:

> How does this compare with the lowmemorykiller.c driver from the 
> android developers that is currently in the linux-next tree?

Also, the low memory notification that Kosaki-san has worked on, and which Minchan is looking at now.

We seem to have many mechanisms under development, all aimed at similar goals. I believe it would be good to agree on one mechanism that could solve multiple of these goals at once, instead of sticking a handful of different partial solutions in the kernel...

Exactly what is the problem you are trying to solve?

--
All rights reversed

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ