[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96C9D994977DD0439FB6D3FE3B13DD907DBD3A9EA9@BGMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 19:42:10 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan.com@...dia.com>,
"lrg@...com" <lrg@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] regulator: Rail is said to be enable only if this and
supply rails are enabled.
> From: linux-tegra-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-tegra-
> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Mark Brown
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 11:37 AM
> > returns true but actually the rail is not enabled because supply rail was
> not enabled.
> > Although it is fixed in other patch but such checks help more.
>
> You're not quite getting my point here - we should be treating this as
> an error and complaining about it when we notice it, your patch will
> silently mask the condition which seems likely to just cause the bug to
> manifest elsewhere.
Agree with you. Thanks for such details.
Thanks,
Laxman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists